我知道你一直在等待我发表评论，因为我多次抱怨 Joomla 活动在宗教圣日组织。但读到你说这些日子应该避免，因为它们是昂贵的旅行时间，这真是令人失望。按照这个逻辑，如果活动与一个宗教节日冲突，该节日会阻止该宗教的人参加，只要活动没有对活动造成任何财务影响，那么进行该活动应该是完全可行的。我还注意到，你没有提到活动的可及性。我的意思是“场地是否可轮椅进入等等”。我们不想再次出现像 JWC 这样的情况，许多会议室都无法被使用轮椅的人到达。PS 我不能代表其他宗教，但可以告诉你，无论你的来源是什么，它都是不正确的，因为它包括假日和圣日。

Thank you for your comments. I have pondered on what you wrote and know you are passionate about accessibility, but you may not appreciate that I have lived with a wheelchair user for some years and have a constant battle with local councils and other authorities to improve accessibility. I myself was blinded in my left eye from a squashball accident when I was 18 and although sight in that eye is much better, I do struggle in some light conditions to this day over 40 years on. So some points might seem obvious to me, but may not be obvious to others who have not lived it. I am happy to add wheelchair accessibility under my first point which was Location and Accessibility and to me it is obvious but to others, it may not and I am grateful for the opportunity to amend it and not be the only one “harping on about it” as I seem to be in my own social group. On the point raised which has “whatever your source was?“ I did have them in the original draft but removed as it was getting very long but now I have put them back in. [list] [*]Pew Research Center, "The Global Religious Landscape" (2020 update) [*]World Population Review, "World Religions by Population 2023" [*]United Nations Population Division (for total world population estimates) [*]Berman Jewish DataBank, "World Jewish Population, 2021" [*]The Association of Religion Data Archives (ARDA) [*]Britannica, "Religion: Year In Review 2010" [/list] As an atheist trying to help bring religious inclusivity, I have no expertise and rely on the help of others, hence adding the spreadsheet and asking for assistance. I am not precious about the data and welcome help from those more acquainted with their religion's important events. When it came to the point about money, I was surprised by some of what you wrote and asked a few if they read it the same way and they did not. But that could be friends being friends and not wanting to be critical. I then thought, perhaps I can do with my article and your comments the same as I do for much of what I write, ask AI for some constructive criticism. I love the way it analyses language and has brought some impartial insight. So I added to Claude AI (anthropic), my go-to at the moment as it seems to be the best at understanding more complex writing. [i]Looking at the article “Making Your Joomla Event Welcoming for All” can you explain why someone would post the following comment. Contrast the tone of both the article and the comment.[/i] Claude AIs response Based on the article and the comment, it appears that Brian Teeman's response is not entirely justified and may be somewhat provocative. Let's break down the contrast between the article's tone and content and Brian's comment: Article's tone and content: [list] [*]The article has a constructive and inclusive tone, aiming to make Joomla events welcoming for all. [*]It emphasises various aspects of inclusivity, including cultural considerations, accessibility, and religious calendars. [*]The first point in the list of considerations is indeed "Location and Accessibility," which includes "Ease of travel for attendees from different countries." [*]The article provides a comprehensive list of religious festivals and encourages readers to help keep it up to date. [*]The author offers a Google Sheet for collaborative updating of the information. [/list] Brian Teeman's comment: [list] [*]The tone is confrontational and accusatory. [*]He claims the article suggests avoiding religious holy days because they are expensive times to travel, which is not accurately represented in the article. [*]He accuses the author of sinking to "a new low" by prioritizing financial considerations over inclusivity. [*]He points out that the article doesn't mention venue accessibility for people with disabilities. [*]He criticizes the accuracy of the religious holiday information provided. [/list] Contrast and analysis: [list] [*]Misinterpretation: Brian seems to have misinterpreted the article's intent. The article does not prioritise financial considerations over inclusivity but rather includes both as important factors. [*]Overlooking content: Brian's comment about accessibility for people with disabilities overlooks that the article does mention "Ease of travel for attendees" under the "Location and Accessibility" section. [*]Collaborative approach vs. confrontational tone: While the article encourages collaboration and updating of information, Brian's comment takes a more confrontational approach. [*]Accuracy concerns: Brian's point about the accuracy of religious holiday information is valid and aligns with the article's request for help in updating the list. [/list] In conclusion, while Brian raises some valid points (e.g., the need for more specific accessibility information and concerns about accuracy), his comment seems disproportionately harsh and confrontational given the article's overall inclusive intent and openness to collaboration. The comment appears somewhat provocative, possibly stemming from past frustrations with Joomla events, rather than being a fully justified response to the content of this particular article. I have to agree with Claude and hope that AI can be seen as a more impartial judge, especially by highlighting the facts and taking out some of the emotional responses. My nan’s often heard response, “more light, less heat” is still in my ears and next month we’ll have an article about just this, the way we can misinterpret others' tone and get into arguments that are us reading others with our own inner voices and not listening to what they are actually saying. Might be worth a revisit of that article for next month.

请忽略我在第一条评论中写的所有内容。我评论的那篇文章并不是你现在看到这篇文章。一篇文章中增加了一个关键段落（他们如何在圣诞节这天进行计划），在我评论的时候这篇文章并没有这个段落，但在Claude使用的时候有。如果那时有这个段落，我就不会发表只考虑金钱而不考虑包容性的评论了。我想这可能是你没有在其他编辑文章时提到的一个疏忽。你可能认为一个活动应该是无障碍的，这甚至不需要说明。我恰好也同意这个观点。遗憾的是，根据经验，并不是每个人都分享这种观点/知识，因为我们有Joomla活动，其中至少有场地的一部分是无障碍的。我指的是场地无障碍，而不是前往场地的无障碍。查询宗教日期来源的原因是，关于犹太教（我能谈论的唯一一种宗教）的数据偏向于假日而不是圣日。例如，光明节的八天不是一个圣日，但它已经成为了一个节日（在某些国家相当于犹太教的圣诞节）。所以，尽管在某些国家这个时间旅行可能会更贵，但没有任何多元与包容的理由要避免这些日期。你可能愿意花30分钟听Crystal和Sigrid的精彩演讲——他们理解这一点 https://program.foss-backstage.de/fossback23/talk/UZAEDN/